It was the lowest number of DLs since Sept 09 even though I have almost three times as many files.  It was the 2nd WMY and it would have been the worst if not for a couple of ELs.

Site mails lose recipient address about half the time after sending. Has gone on forever.

Hoping it's because of the current site wonkiness, but I can't get DeepMeta to download my data. Can't upload, just need to be patient I guess.


ETA - Never mind. Fifth try was the charm. Everything good and DM is up to date now on the interim PC.

(Edited on 2012-07-01 13:28:19 by Willowpix)

Agree Ted. Vetta and I had a brief meeting a few weeks ago, but she hasn't been around ever since. I think it was something I said. No prob though, E+ has been a good friend to me lately as well, he's bought me a few beers over the past week or so.




^ dare I ask?


Thought I'd post this pic of this lovely young lady before it gets rejected for artifacts (which I think it might). I think I posted this already as a BTS image from the lypse, but I decided to upload it this weekend. (hmm, it seems a little dark in the thumbnail...)

I am interested in this - please keep me in the loop. Specifically interested in stages 1, 2 and 3 dependant on the costs.

(Edited on 2012-07-01 23:26:43 by tirc83)

Here is a late review as I don't normally check the forums;
On my laptop, it shows the photo perfectly framed with black, you would not think that you could scroll down. As a result I thought there is nothing to click on the page for a while.
May be you can somehow make it fit the screen, or fix the menu to the bottom of the page regardless of the browser size.

http://shade-of-light.com/2012/07/02/hsbc-are-using-my-tea-cups-photo/


As a customer visiting their website, I found today my image being used:


 


I only sold two copies of it: the first, large, in 2010, and the second, XSmall, in April 2012. I assume they are using the XSmall version - that looks to me a little upsized on their website. I was expecting/hoping a bank would not go for a cheap XSmall but, well... it must be the Recession ;-)


I took this photo on film, on a Contax 139Q. I almost never use film at home - a very rare occurrence!


As you can see the original image is vertical: they worked a lot to extend it horizontally.

THE WALL OF SHAME...


This is only a placer... the image will be replaced as soon as design is recieved.
Please dont rate on this image until the proper file has been uploaded.

(Edited on 2012-07-01 17:17:33 by TEAMdue)

here's one




(Edited on 2012-07-02 07:13:19 by HHakim)

(Edited on 2012-07-02 07:15:17 by HHakim)

And then I started bowflexin.

das musst du erst noch beweisen ..Streichelfoto bitte :D

J'ai fini par poster un message dans le forum anglais.


ici : http://francais.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=341967&messageid=6700245


Effectivement, c'est un problème technique appelé connector IS => PP. Nous verrons la réponse sur le forum générale, et vous me direz si je vous tiens au courant


De plus j'ai trouvé çà qui répond en parties je pense, aux questions de Clopixe :


http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=344185


""""What happens if I participate in the Partner Program and decide to go Exclusive?

If a non-Exclusive becomes Exclusive, any opted-in files that are younger than 18 months will be deactivated from iStock. If you become Exclusive and you do not want your newest files to be deactivated from iStock, you will need to opt them out of the Partner Program"""""

Congrats! :D

Can I also add to the above the dishes "loc lac" = "lok lak" - Cambodian Cuisine


And "bo luc lac" = "Shaking Beef" - Vietnamese cuisine.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_cuisine


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnamese_cuisine


 

Cool man I found in the lake - he's in better shape than most of us!  




(Edited on 2012-07-01 14:25:03 by stevecoleimages)

Uploaded 30.6. approved today




Editorial uploaded 24.6 still in the queu . . . why this difference??

Susan_Stewart, I didn't even know you could do art of such precision on an Ipad - not that I have one. Awesome!


 

More to the point is, how does a buyer know which colour space your image should be viewed in, if you don't give them that information?

(Edited on 2012-07-02 06:57:08 by Whiteway)

I've been working with video for a while but I've been wondering about this after this weekend. I'm working in Premiere Pro and usually build a sequence based on my footage and then export to the size I need it. Lately, I've been working with some "odd sized" footage (screen caps, different resolution cameras...etc.). And some of the screen caps were fuzzy. They looked fine in my sequence but on export, total mush... My resolution was to create a sequence that was the size of my final export and then export at 100% and do the scaling in the sequence and not on export.


Is that normal and is that the "correct" workflow for that premise.... Should I continue to build my sequences based on my final export?


Question 2)  I have been playing with my GoPro and recently tested shooting it in 60p mode. The footage is nice and smooth. I created a sequence again... 720/60p. Editted and exported using the YouTube Widescreen HD preset. But I get odd "jumping" every so many frames. I assume this is because my footage was 60p and the export was 30 (29.97 actually I think).  Did I miss a crucial step somewhere? (pull down?)


 


While I see these as different questions. I suspect that someone will tell me that all my problems are inter-related. That I need to setup my sequences "properly". I've not had these problems before cause I always seemed to shoot in the export format. Now that I'm "jumping around" I'm getting weirdness.


Thanks in advance for any help!

My file 19130080 was free file of the month during May, but I just noticed it is still available for free here http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-audio-19130080-hunted-loop-2-long.php

One of my missing images (many from 2010-11) has appeared on TS. The thumbnail only shows 1/4 of the image!!!! It takes months to move images that were sent to the PP long before it was mandatory and when ONE finally moves over the thumbnail is effed up.

What a joke. (sigh) I give up.

Thanks Jane. I sent Erwin a note.

I run LR4.1 on a Win7x64. I have noticed that a large number of jpgs, psds etc. that are in my LR catalog had their "last modified date" set to the current date even though I had not edited them. This is strange and unsettling to say the least. Has anyone else encountered this?
I noticed the files happen to be older files (2+ years old).

(Edited on 2012-06-01 13:39:21 by wdstock)

Uploaded on the June 20, downloaded today