Buying Options
Print List Price: | $16.00 |
Kindle Price: |
$12.99
Save $3.01 (19%) |
Sold by: |
Random House LLC
Price set by seller. |

Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.

![Machines Like Me: A Novel by [Ian McEwan]](https://iza-server.uibk.ac.at/pywb/dilimag/20210113092156im_/https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/5183TXj1vLL._SY346_.jpg)
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
Machines Like Me: A Novel Kindle Edition
by
Ian McEwan
(Author)
Format: Kindle Edition
Ian McEwan
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
Are you an author?
Learn about Author Central
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$0.00
|
Free with your Audible trial |
Hardcover, Deckle Edge
"Please retry"
|
$8.72 | $2.25 |
Audio CD, Audiobook, CD, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$29.48 | $28.98 |
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherAnchor
-
Publication dateApril 23, 2019
-
File size1532 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Amazon Business: Make the most of your Amazon Business account with exclusive tools and savings. Login now
Editorial Reviews
Review
“A sharply intelligent novel of ideas. McEwan’s writing about the creation of a robot’s personality allows him to speculate on the nature of personality, and thus humanity, in general . . . Beguiling.”
—Dwight Garner, The New York Times
"[A] sharp, unsettling read . . . about love, family, jealousy and deceit. Ultimately, it asks a surprisingly mournful question: If we built a machine that could look into our hearts, could we really expect it to like what it sees?"
—Jeff Giles, The New York Times Book Review
“[McEwan] is not only one of the most elegant writers alive, he is one of the most astute at crafting moral dilemmas within the drama of everyday life. Half a century ago, Philip K. Dick asked, ‘Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?,’ and now McEwan is sure those androids are pulling the wool over our eyes. McEwan’s special contribution is not to articulate the challenge of robots but to cleverly embed that challenge in the lives of two people trying to find a way to exist with purpose. That human drama makes Machines Like Me strikingly relevant even though it’s set in a world that never happened almost 40 years ago.”
—Ron Charles, The Washington Post
“Witty and humane . . . a retrofuturist family drama that doubles as a cautionary fable about artificial intelligence, consent, and justice.”
—Julian Lucas, The New Yorker
“[A] densely allusive, mind-bending novel of ideas that plays to our acute sense of foreboding about where technology is leading us. In Machines Like Me, British literary fiction master Ian McEwan posits an alternative history . . . [it has] the feel of an intricate literary machine situated squarely on the fault lines of contemporary debates about technology.”
—LA Times
“A thought-provoking, well-oiled literary machine . . . [It] manages to flesh out—literally and grippingly—questions about what constitutes a person, and the troubling future of humans if the smart machines we create can overtake us."
—Heller McAlpin, NPR
“A searching, sharply intelligent, and often deeply discomfiting pass through the Black Mirror looking glass—and all the promise and peril of machine dreams.”
—Leah Greenblatt, Entertainment Weekly
“A ruminative mix of science fiction, romance and alternate history set in 1980s London….thought-provoking…[A] cautionary tale based on McEwan’s sharp observations of our flawed human nature.”
—Denver Post
“Enormous fun . . . McEwan has engaged with science before [and] his world of artificial intelligence is chilly, clever and utterly credible. This bold and brilliant novel tells a consistently compelling tale but it also provides regular food for thought regarding who we are, what we feel, what we construct, and what we might become.”
–Minneapolis Star Tribune
“Reminds you of [McEwan’s] mastery of the underrated craft of storytelling. The narrative is propulsive, thanks to our uncertainties about the characters’ motives, the turning points that suddenly reconfigure our understanding of the plot, and the figure of Adam, whose ambiguous energy is both mysteriously human and mysteriously not . . . Morally complex and very disturbing, animated by a spirit of sinister and intelligent mischief that feels unique to its author.”
—Marcel Theroux, The Guardian
"Thought provoking . . . consistently surprising . . . an intriguing novel about humans, machines, and what constitutes a self."
—Publishers Weekly
"McEwan brings humor and considerable ethical rumination to a cautionary tale about artificial intelligence."
—Kirkus
—Dwight Garner, The New York Times
"[A] sharp, unsettling read . . . about love, family, jealousy and deceit. Ultimately, it asks a surprisingly mournful question: If we built a machine that could look into our hearts, could we really expect it to like what it sees?"
—Jeff Giles, The New York Times Book Review
“[McEwan] is not only one of the most elegant writers alive, he is one of the most astute at crafting moral dilemmas within the drama of everyday life. Half a century ago, Philip K. Dick asked, ‘Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?,’ and now McEwan is sure those androids are pulling the wool over our eyes. McEwan’s special contribution is not to articulate the challenge of robots but to cleverly embed that challenge in the lives of two people trying to find a way to exist with purpose. That human drama makes Machines Like Me strikingly relevant even though it’s set in a world that never happened almost 40 years ago.”
—Ron Charles, The Washington Post
“Witty and humane . . . a retrofuturist family drama that doubles as a cautionary fable about artificial intelligence, consent, and justice.”
—Julian Lucas, The New Yorker
“[A] densely allusive, mind-bending novel of ideas that plays to our acute sense of foreboding about where technology is leading us. In Machines Like Me, British literary fiction master Ian McEwan posits an alternative history . . . [it has] the feel of an intricate literary machine situated squarely on the fault lines of contemporary debates about technology.”
—LA Times
“A thought-provoking, well-oiled literary machine . . . [It] manages to flesh out—literally and grippingly—questions about what constitutes a person, and the troubling future of humans if the smart machines we create can overtake us."
—Heller McAlpin, NPR
“A searching, sharply intelligent, and often deeply discomfiting pass through the Black Mirror looking glass—and all the promise and peril of machine dreams.”
—Leah Greenblatt, Entertainment Weekly
“A ruminative mix of science fiction, romance and alternate history set in 1980s London….thought-provoking…[A] cautionary tale based on McEwan’s sharp observations of our flawed human nature.”
—Denver Post
“Enormous fun . . . McEwan has engaged with science before [and] his world of artificial intelligence is chilly, clever and utterly credible. This bold and brilliant novel tells a consistently compelling tale but it also provides regular food for thought regarding who we are, what we feel, what we construct, and what we might become.”
–Minneapolis Star Tribune
“Reminds you of [McEwan’s] mastery of the underrated craft of storytelling. The narrative is propulsive, thanks to our uncertainties about the characters’ motives, the turning points that suddenly reconfigure our understanding of the plot, and the figure of Adam, whose ambiguous energy is both mysteriously human and mysteriously not . . . Morally complex and very disturbing, animated by a spirit of sinister and intelligent mischief that feels unique to its author.”
—Marcel Theroux, The Guardian
"Thought provoking . . . consistently surprising . . . an intriguing novel about humans, machines, and what constitutes a self."
—Publishers Weekly
"McEwan brings humor and considerable ethical rumination to a cautionary tale about artificial intelligence."
—Kirkus
About the Author
IAN McEWAN is the bestselling author of seventeen books, including the novels Nutshell; The Children Act; Sweet Tooth; Solar, winner of the Bollinger Everyman Wodehouse Prize; On Chesil Beach; Saturday; Atonement, winner of the National Book Critics Circle Award and the W. H. Smith Literary Award; The Comfort of Strangers and Black Dogs, both short-listed for the Booker Prize; Amsterdam, winner of the Booker Prize; and The Child in Time, winner of the Whitbread Award; as well as the story collections First Love, Last Rites, winner of the Somerset Maugham Award, and In Between the Sheets.
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
ONE
It was religious yearning granted hope, it was the holygrail of science. Our ambitions ran high and low—for a creation myth made real, for a monstrous act of self-love. As soon as it was feasible, we had no choice but to follow ourdesires and hang the consequences. In loftiest terms, we aimed to escape our mortality, confront or even replace the Godhead with a perfect self. More practically, we intended to devise an improved, more modern version of ourselves and exult in the joy of invention, the thrill of mastery. In the autumn of the twentieth century, it came about at last, the first step towards the fulfilment of an ancient dream, the beginning of the long lesson we would teach ourselves that however complicated we were, however faulty and difficult to describe in even our simplest actions and modes of being, we could be imitated and bettered. And I was there as a young man, an early and eager adopter in that chilly dawn.
But artificial humans were a cliché long before they arrived, so when they did, they seemed to some a disappointment. The imagination, fleeter than history, than technological advance, had already rehearsed this future in books, then films and TV dramas, as if human actors, walking with a certain glazed look, phony head movements, some stiffness in the lower back, could prepare us for life with our cousins from the future.
I was among the optimists, blessed by unexpected funds following my mother’s death and the sale of the family home, which turned out to be on a valuable development site. The first truly viable manufactured human with plausible intelligence and looks, believable motion and shifts of expression went on sale the week before the Falkland Task Force set off on its hopeless mission. Adam cost £86,000. I brought him home in a hired van to my unpleasant flat in north Clapham. I’d made a reckless decision, but I was encouraged by reports that Sir Alan Turing, war hero and presiding genius of the digital age, had taken delivery of the same model. He probably wanted to have his lab take it apart to examine its workings fully.
Twelve of this first edition were called Adam, thirteen were called Eve. Corny, everyone agreed, but commercial. Notions of biological race being scientifically discredited,the twenty-five were designed to cover a range of ethnicities. There were rumours, then complaints, that the Arab could not be told apart from the Jew. Random programming as well as life experience would grant to all complete latitude in sexual preference. By the end of the first week, all the Eves sold out. At a careless glance, I might have taken my Adam for a Turk or a Greek. He weighed 170 pounds, so I had to ask my upstairs neighbour, Miranda, to help me carry him in from the street on the disposable stretcher that came with the purchase.
While his batteries began to charge, I made us coffee, then scrolled through the 470-page online handbook. Its language was mostly clear and precise. But Adam was created across different agencies and in places the instructions had the charm of a nonsense poem. “Unreveal upside of B347k vest to gain carefree emoticon with motherboard output to attenuate mood-swing penumbra.”
At last, with cardboard and polystyrene wrapping strewn around his ankles, he sat naked at my tiny dining table, eyes closed, a black power line trailing from the entry point in his umbilicus to a thirteen-amp socket in the wall. It would take sixteen hours to fire him up. Then sessions of download updates and personal preferences. I wanted him now, and so did Miranda. Like eager young parents, we were avid for his first words. There was no loudspeaker cheaply buried in his chest. We knew from the excited publicity that he formed sounds with breath, tongue, teeth and palate. Already his lifelike skin was warm to the touch and as smooth as a child’s. Miranda claimed to see his eyelashes flicker. I was certain she was seeing vibrations from the Tube trains rolling a hundred feet below us, but I said nothing.
Adam was not a sex toy. However, he was capable of sex and possessed functional mucous membranes, in the maintenanceof which he consumed half a litre of water each day. While he sat at the table, I observed that he was uncircumcised, fairly well endowed, with copious dark pubic hair. This highly advanced model of artificial human was likely to reflect the appetites of its young creators of code. The Adams and Eves, it was thought, would be lively.
He was advertised as a companion, an intellectual sparring partner, friend and factotum who could wash dishes, make beds and “think.” Every moment of his existence, everything he heard and saw, he recorded and could retrieve. He couldn’t drive as yet and was not allowed to swim or shower or go out in the rain without an umbrella, or operate a chainsaw unsupervised. As for range, thanks to breakthroughs in electrical storage, he could run seventeen kilometres in two hours without a charge or, its energy equivalent, converse non-stop for twelve days. He had a working life of twenty years. He was compactly built, square-shouldered, dark-skinned, with thick black hair swept back; narrow in the face, with a hint of hooked nose suggestive of fierce intelligence, pensively hooded eyes, tight lips that, even as we watched, were draining of their deathly yellowish-white tint and acquiring rich human colour, perhaps even relaxing a little at the corners. Miranda said he resembled “a docker from the Bosphorus.”
Before us sat the ultimate plaything, the dream of ages, the triumph of humanism—or its angel of death. Exciting beyond measure, but frustrating too. Sixteen hours was a long time to be waiting and watching. I thought that for the sum I’d handed over after lunch, Adam should have been charged up and ready to go. It was a wintry late afternoon. I made toast and we drank more coffee. Miranda, a doctoral scholar of social history, said she wished the teenage Mary Shelley was here beside us, observing closely, not a monster like Frankenstein’s, but this handsome dark-skinned young man coming to life. I said that what both creatures shared was a hunger for the animating force of electricity.
“We share it too.” She spoke as though she was referring only to herself and me, rather than all of electrochemically charged humanity.
She was twenty-two,mature for her years and ten years younger than me. From a long perspective, there was not much between us. We were gloriously young. But I considered myself at a different stage of life. My formal education was far behind me. I’d suffered a series of professional and financial and personal failures. I regarded myself as too hard-bitten,too cynical for a lovely young woman like Miranda. And though she was beautiful, with pale brown hair and a long thin face, and eyes that often appeared narrowed by suppressed mirth,and though in certain moods I looked at her in wonder, I’d decided early on to confine her in the role of kind, neighbourly friend. We shared an entrance hall and her tiny apartment was right over mine. We saw each other for a coffee now and then to talk about relationships and politics and all the rest. With pitch-perfectneutrality she gave the impression of being at ease with the possibilities. To her, it seemed, an afternoon of intimate pleasure with me would have weighed equally with a chaste and companionable chat. She was relaxed in my company and I preferred to think that sex would ruin everything. We remained good chums. But there was something alluringly secretive or restrained about her. Perhaps, without knowing it, I had been in love with her for months. Without knowing it? What a flimsy formulation that was!
Reluctantly, we agreed to turn our backs on Adam and on each other for a while. Miranda had a seminar to attend northof the river, I had emails to write. By the early seventies, digital communication had discarded its air of convenience andbecome a daily chore. Likewise the 250 mph trains—crowded and dirty. Speech-recognition software, a fifties miracle, had long turned to drudge, with entire populations sacrificing hours each day to lonely soliloquising. Brain–machine interfacing, wild fruit of sixties optimism, could barely arouse the interest of a child. What people queued the entire weekend for became, six months later, as interesting as the socks on their feet. What happened to the cognition-enhancing helmets, the speaking fridges with a sense of smell? Gone the way of the mouse pad, the Filofax, the electric carving knife, the fondue set. The future kept arriving. Our bright new toys began to rust before we could get them home, and life went on much as before.
Would Adam become a bore? It’s not easy, to dictate while trying to ward off a bout of buyer’s remorse. Surely other people, other minds must continue to fascinate us. As artificial intelligence became more like us, than became us, then became more than us, we could never tire of them. They were bound to surprise us. They might fail us in ways that were beyond our imagining. Tragedy was a possibility, but not boredom.
What was tedious was the prospect of the user’s guide. Instructions. My prejudice was that any machine that could not tell you by its very functioning how it should be used was not worth its keep. On an old-fashioned impulse, I was printingout the manual, then looking for a folder. All the while, I continued to dictate emails.
I couldn’t think of myself as Adam’s “user.” I’d assumed there was nothing to learn about him that he could not teach me himself. But the manual in my hands had fallen open at Chapter Fourteen. Here the English was plain: preferences; personality parameters. Then a set of headings—Agreeableness. Extraversion. Openness to experience. Conscientiousness. Emotional stability. The list was familiar to me. The Five Factor model. Educated as I was in the humanities, I was suspiciousof such reductive categories, though I knew from a friend in psychology that each item had many subgroups. Glancing at the next page I saw that I was supposed to select various settings on a scale of one to ten.
I’d been expecting a friend. I was ready to treat Adam as a guest in my home, as an unknown I would come to know. I’d thought he would arrive optimally adjusted. Factory settings—a contemporary synonym for fate. My friends, family and acquaintances all had appeared in my life with fixed settings, with unalterable histories of genes and environment. I wanted my expensive new friend to do the same. Why leave it to me? But of course I knew the answer. Not many of us are optimally adjusted. Gentle Jesus? Humble Darwin? One every 1,800 years. Even if it knew the best, the least harmful parameters of personality, which it couldn’t, a worldwide corporation with a precious reputation couldn’t risk a mishap. Caveat emptor.
God had once delivered a fully formed companion for the benefit of the original Adam. I had to devise one for myself. Here was Extraversion and a graded set of childish statements. He loves to be the life and soul of the party and He knows how to entertain people and lead them. And at the bottom, He feelsuncomfortable around other people and He prefers his own company. Here in the middle was, He likes a good party but he’s always happy to come home. This was me. But should I be replicating myself? If I was to choose from the middle ofeach scale I might devise the soul of blandness. Extraversion appeared to include its antonym. There was a long adjectival list with boxes to tick: outgoing, shy, excitable, talkative, withdrawn, boastful, modest, bold, energetic, moody. I wanted none of them, not for him, not for myself.
Apart from my moments of crazed decisions, I passed most of my life, especially when alone, in a state of mood neutrality, with my personality, whatever that was, in suspension. Not bold, not withdrawn. Simply here, neither content nor morose, but carrying out tasks, thinking about dinner or sex, staring at the screen, taking a shower. Intermittent regrets about the past, occasional forebodings about the future, barely aware of the present, except in the obvious sensory realm. Psychology, once so interested in the trillion ways the mind goes awry, was now drawn to what it considered the common emotions, from grief to joy. But it had overlooked a vast domain of everyday existence: absent illness, famine, war or other stresses, a lot of life is lived in the neutral zone, a familiar garden, but a grey one, unremarkable, immediately forgotten, hard to describe.
At the time, I was not to know that these graded optionswould have little effect on Adam. The real determinant was what was known as “machine learning.” The user’s handbook merely granted an illusion of influence and control, the kind of illusion parents have in relation to their children’s personalities. It was a way of binding me to my purchase and providing legal protection for the manufacturer. “Take your time,” the manual advised. “Choose carefully. Allow yourself several weeks, if necessary.”
I let half an hour pass before I checked on him again. No change. Still at the table, arms pushed out straight before him, eyes closed. But I thought his hair, deepest black, was bulked out a little and had acquired a certain shine, as though he’d just had a shower. Stepping closer, I saw to my delight that though he wasn’t breathing, there was, by his left breast, a regular pulse, steady and calm, about one a second by my inexperienced guess. How reassuring. He had no blood to pump around, but this simulation had an effect. My doubts faded just a little. I felt protective towards Adam, even as I knew how absurd it was. I stretched out my hand and laid it over his heart and felt against my palm its calm, iambic tread. I sensed I was violating his private space. These vital signs were easy to believe in. The warmth of his skin, the firmness and yield of the muscle below it—my reason said plastic or some such, but my touch responded to flesh.
It was eerie, to be standing by this naked man, struggling between what I knew and what I felt. I walked behind him, partly to be out of range of eyes that could open at any moment and find me looming over him. He was muscular around his neck and spine. Dark hair grew along the line of his shoulders. His buttocks displayed muscular concavities. Below them, an athlete’s knotted calves. I hadn’t wanted a superman. I regretted once more that I’d been too late for an Eve. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
It was religious yearning granted hope, it was the holygrail of science. Our ambitions ran high and low—for a creation myth made real, for a monstrous act of self-love. As soon as it was feasible, we had no choice but to follow ourdesires and hang the consequences. In loftiest terms, we aimed to escape our mortality, confront or even replace the Godhead with a perfect self. More practically, we intended to devise an improved, more modern version of ourselves and exult in the joy of invention, the thrill of mastery. In the autumn of the twentieth century, it came about at last, the first step towards the fulfilment of an ancient dream, the beginning of the long lesson we would teach ourselves that however complicated we were, however faulty and difficult to describe in even our simplest actions and modes of being, we could be imitated and bettered. And I was there as a young man, an early and eager adopter in that chilly dawn.
But artificial humans were a cliché long before they arrived, so when they did, they seemed to some a disappointment. The imagination, fleeter than history, than technological advance, had already rehearsed this future in books, then films and TV dramas, as if human actors, walking with a certain glazed look, phony head movements, some stiffness in the lower back, could prepare us for life with our cousins from the future.
I was among the optimists, blessed by unexpected funds following my mother’s death and the sale of the family home, which turned out to be on a valuable development site. The first truly viable manufactured human with plausible intelligence and looks, believable motion and shifts of expression went on sale the week before the Falkland Task Force set off on its hopeless mission. Adam cost £86,000. I brought him home in a hired van to my unpleasant flat in north Clapham. I’d made a reckless decision, but I was encouraged by reports that Sir Alan Turing, war hero and presiding genius of the digital age, had taken delivery of the same model. He probably wanted to have his lab take it apart to examine its workings fully.
Twelve of this first edition were called Adam, thirteen were called Eve. Corny, everyone agreed, but commercial. Notions of biological race being scientifically discredited,the twenty-five were designed to cover a range of ethnicities. There were rumours, then complaints, that the Arab could not be told apart from the Jew. Random programming as well as life experience would grant to all complete latitude in sexual preference. By the end of the first week, all the Eves sold out. At a careless glance, I might have taken my Adam for a Turk or a Greek. He weighed 170 pounds, so I had to ask my upstairs neighbour, Miranda, to help me carry him in from the street on the disposable stretcher that came with the purchase.
While his batteries began to charge, I made us coffee, then scrolled through the 470-page online handbook. Its language was mostly clear and precise. But Adam was created across different agencies and in places the instructions had the charm of a nonsense poem. “Unreveal upside of B347k vest to gain carefree emoticon with motherboard output to attenuate mood-swing penumbra.”
At last, with cardboard and polystyrene wrapping strewn around his ankles, he sat naked at my tiny dining table, eyes closed, a black power line trailing from the entry point in his umbilicus to a thirteen-amp socket in the wall. It would take sixteen hours to fire him up. Then sessions of download updates and personal preferences. I wanted him now, and so did Miranda. Like eager young parents, we were avid for his first words. There was no loudspeaker cheaply buried in his chest. We knew from the excited publicity that he formed sounds with breath, tongue, teeth and palate. Already his lifelike skin was warm to the touch and as smooth as a child’s. Miranda claimed to see his eyelashes flicker. I was certain she was seeing vibrations from the Tube trains rolling a hundred feet below us, but I said nothing.
Adam was not a sex toy. However, he was capable of sex and possessed functional mucous membranes, in the maintenanceof which he consumed half a litre of water each day. While he sat at the table, I observed that he was uncircumcised, fairly well endowed, with copious dark pubic hair. This highly advanced model of artificial human was likely to reflect the appetites of its young creators of code. The Adams and Eves, it was thought, would be lively.
He was advertised as a companion, an intellectual sparring partner, friend and factotum who could wash dishes, make beds and “think.” Every moment of his existence, everything he heard and saw, he recorded and could retrieve. He couldn’t drive as yet and was not allowed to swim or shower or go out in the rain without an umbrella, or operate a chainsaw unsupervised. As for range, thanks to breakthroughs in electrical storage, he could run seventeen kilometres in two hours without a charge or, its energy equivalent, converse non-stop for twelve days. He had a working life of twenty years. He was compactly built, square-shouldered, dark-skinned, with thick black hair swept back; narrow in the face, with a hint of hooked nose suggestive of fierce intelligence, pensively hooded eyes, tight lips that, even as we watched, were draining of their deathly yellowish-white tint and acquiring rich human colour, perhaps even relaxing a little at the corners. Miranda said he resembled “a docker from the Bosphorus.”
Before us sat the ultimate plaything, the dream of ages, the triumph of humanism—or its angel of death. Exciting beyond measure, but frustrating too. Sixteen hours was a long time to be waiting and watching. I thought that for the sum I’d handed over after lunch, Adam should have been charged up and ready to go. It was a wintry late afternoon. I made toast and we drank more coffee. Miranda, a doctoral scholar of social history, said she wished the teenage Mary Shelley was here beside us, observing closely, not a monster like Frankenstein’s, but this handsome dark-skinned young man coming to life. I said that what both creatures shared was a hunger for the animating force of electricity.
“We share it too.” She spoke as though she was referring only to herself and me, rather than all of electrochemically charged humanity.
She was twenty-two,mature for her years and ten years younger than me. From a long perspective, there was not much between us. We were gloriously young. But I considered myself at a different stage of life. My formal education was far behind me. I’d suffered a series of professional and financial and personal failures. I regarded myself as too hard-bitten,too cynical for a lovely young woman like Miranda. And though she was beautiful, with pale brown hair and a long thin face, and eyes that often appeared narrowed by suppressed mirth,and though in certain moods I looked at her in wonder, I’d decided early on to confine her in the role of kind, neighbourly friend. We shared an entrance hall and her tiny apartment was right over mine. We saw each other for a coffee now and then to talk about relationships and politics and all the rest. With pitch-perfectneutrality she gave the impression of being at ease with the possibilities. To her, it seemed, an afternoon of intimate pleasure with me would have weighed equally with a chaste and companionable chat. She was relaxed in my company and I preferred to think that sex would ruin everything. We remained good chums. But there was something alluringly secretive or restrained about her. Perhaps, without knowing it, I had been in love with her for months. Without knowing it? What a flimsy formulation that was!
Reluctantly, we agreed to turn our backs on Adam and on each other for a while. Miranda had a seminar to attend northof the river, I had emails to write. By the early seventies, digital communication had discarded its air of convenience andbecome a daily chore. Likewise the 250 mph trains—crowded and dirty. Speech-recognition software, a fifties miracle, had long turned to drudge, with entire populations sacrificing hours each day to lonely soliloquising. Brain–machine interfacing, wild fruit of sixties optimism, could barely arouse the interest of a child. What people queued the entire weekend for became, six months later, as interesting as the socks on their feet. What happened to the cognition-enhancing helmets, the speaking fridges with a sense of smell? Gone the way of the mouse pad, the Filofax, the electric carving knife, the fondue set. The future kept arriving. Our bright new toys began to rust before we could get them home, and life went on much as before.
Would Adam become a bore? It’s not easy, to dictate while trying to ward off a bout of buyer’s remorse. Surely other people, other minds must continue to fascinate us. As artificial intelligence became more like us, than became us, then became more than us, we could never tire of them. They were bound to surprise us. They might fail us in ways that were beyond our imagining. Tragedy was a possibility, but not boredom.
What was tedious was the prospect of the user’s guide. Instructions. My prejudice was that any machine that could not tell you by its very functioning how it should be used was not worth its keep. On an old-fashioned impulse, I was printingout the manual, then looking for a folder. All the while, I continued to dictate emails.
I couldn’t think of myself as Adam’s “user.” I’d assumed there was nothing to learn about him that he could not teach me himself. But the manual in my hands had fallen open at Chapter Fourteen. Here the English was plain: preferences; personality parameters. Then a set of headings—Agreeableness. Extraversion. Openness to experience. Conscientiousness. Emotional stability. The list was familiar to me. The Five Factor model. Educated as I was in the humanities, I was suspiciousof such reductive categories, though I knew from a friend in psychology that each item had many subgroups. Glancing at the next page I saw that I was supposed to select various settings on a scale of one to ten.
I’d been expecting a friend. I was ready to treat Adam as a guest in my home, as an unknown I would come to know. I’d thought he would arrive optimally adjusted. Factory settings—a contemporary synonym for fate. My friends, family and acquaintances all had appeared in my life with fixed settings, with unalterable histories of genes and environment. I wanted my expensive new friend to do the same. Why leave it to me? But of course I knew the answer. Not many of us are optimally adjusted. Gentle Jesus? Humble Darwin? One every 1,800 years. Even if it knew the best, the least harmful parameters of personality, which it couldn’t, a worldwide corporation with a precious reputation couldn’t risk a mishap. Caveat emptor.
God had once delivered a fully formed companion for the benefit of the original Adam. I had to devise one for myself. Here was Extraversion and a graded set of childish statements. He loves to be the life and soul of the party and He knows how to entertain people and lead them. And at the bottom, He feelsuncomfortable around other people and He prefers his own company. Here in the middle was, He likes a good party but he’s always happy to come home. This was me. But should I be replicating myself? If I was to choose from the middle ofeach scale I might devise the soul of blandness. Extraversion appeared to include its antonym. There was a long adjectival list with boxes to tick: outgoing, shy, excitable, talkative, withdrawn, boastful, modest, bold, energetic, moody. I wanted none of them, not for him, not for myself.
Apart from my moments of crazed decisions, I passed most of my life, especially when alone, in a state of mood neutrality, with my personality, whatever that was, in suspension. Not bold, not withdrawn. Simply here, neither content nor morose, but carrying out tasks, thinking about dinner or sex, staring at the screen, taking a shower. Intermittent regrets about the past, occasional forebodings about the future, barely aware of the present, except in the obvious sensory realm. Psychology, once so interested in the trillion ways the mind goes awry, was now drawn to what it considered the common emotions, from grief to joy. But it had overlooked a vast domain of everyday existence: absent illness, famine, war or other stresses, a lot of life is lived in the neutral zone, a familiar garden, but a grey one, unremarkable, immediately forgotten, hard to describe.
At the time, I was not to know that these graded optionswould have little effect on Adam. The real determinant was what was known as “machine learning.” The user’s handbook merely granted an illusion of influence and control, the kind of illusion parents have in relation to their children’s personalities. It was a way of binding me to my purchase and providing legal protection for the manufacturer. “Take your time,” the manual advised. “Choose carefully. Allow yourself several weeks, if necessary.”
I let half an hour pass before I checked on him again. No change. Still at the table, arms pushed out straight before him, eyes closed. But I thought his hair, deepest black, was bulked out a little and had acquired a certain shine, as though he’d just had a shower. Stepping closer, I saw to my delight that though he wasn’t breathing, there was, by his left breast, a regular pulse, steady and calm, about one a second by my inexperienced guess. How reassuring. He had no blood to pump around, but this simulation had an effect. My doubts faded just a little. I felt protective towards Adam, even as I knew how absurd it was. I stretched out my hand and laid it over his heart and felt against my palm its calm, iambic tread. I sensed I was violating his private space. These vital signs were easy to believe in. The warmth of his skin, the firmness and yield of the muscle below it—my reason said plastic or some such, but my touch responded to flesh.
It was eerie, to be standing by this naked man, struggling between what I knew and what I felt. I walked behind him, partly to be out of range of eyes that could open at any moment and find me looming over him. He was muscular around his neck and spine. Dark hair grew along the line of his shoulders. His buttocks displayed muscular concavities. Below them, an athlete’s knotted calves. I hadn’t wanted a superman. I regretted once more that I’d been too late for an Eve. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Product details
- ASIN : B07HW18VDM
- Publisher : Anchor (April 23, 2019)
- Publication date : April 23, 2019
- Language : English
- File size : 1532 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 332 pages
- Lending : Not Enabled
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#121,875 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #401 in Alternate History Science Fiction (Books)
- #449 in Alternative History
- #658 in British & Irish Literary Fiction
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.1 out of 5 stars
4.1 out of 5
667 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on April 25, 2019
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
which is a superficial puff piece more suited to a jacket rave intended to sell a mediocre "best seller." The characters are hardly developed, including the "robot." Too much of the redundant prose is taken up by the author's penchant for self satisfied display of a layman's sketchy knowledge of AI and "alternative history." Definitely not worth even the half price e-book price.
89 people found this helpful
Helpful
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2019
Verified Purchase
what in the name of the good lord happened Ian?? i have read all your books from sublime to bizarre[think of the narrator of nutshell] couldn't wait for this one .....i started ..i continued.....thinking this is not Ian....disjointed confusing please please, Ian settle down pick a topic,...its about artificial intelligence in the future no its about thatcher and the Falklands..no..its about the stock market no.. its about child abuse and adoption.. no... its about the IRA blowing up a a PM ...no....its about the guy who broke the German code ....no.....its about obtuse poetry ....no its about rape and the middle-eastern familial view .......no its about the least empathetic narrator character ever created ... the loser of the present and i guess future....please Ian whatever this was all about don't do it again.....
64 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on April 30, 2019
Verified Purchase
This is the report of a burnt child.
I first encountered Mr. McEwan in “Nutshell” and was completely charmed. I was expecting a lot when I opened “Machines”, and the spell didn’t wear off until I finished it, late the next night. I gave it five stars, flipped shut my Kindle, and switched off the light. By the next day, however, I was beginning to have doubts. Why the many-chaptered change of history, starting with the wholly fictional defeat in the Falklands War? Why the elevation of Tony Benn to be Prime Minister, when it never happened? Closer to home, why did Adam, the robot, hold as Original Equipment the court records of a rape trial in a provincial English town?
I’m afraid that it meant that Mr. McEwan had bitten off more than he could chew, and was frantically avoiding the elephant in the room – a discussion of the moral questions raised in forming a personality from scratch, as Charlie and Miranda, our living protagonists, were faced with doing. Adam was a marvelous machine – he could even enjoy sex – but as delivered he was an ethical blank slate.
So, Mr. McEwan has punted. The book is a mishmash of incident, but we never get down to brass tacks. My five stars have slipped to three.
I first encountered Mr. McEwan in “Nutshell” and was completely charmed. I was expecting a lot when I opened “Machines”, and the spell didn’t wear off until I finished it, late the next night. I gave it five stars, flipped shut my Kindle, and switched off the light. By the next day, however, I was beginning to have doubts. Why the many-chaptered change of history, starting with the wholly fictional defeat in the Falklands War? Why the elevation of Tony Benn to be Prime Minister, when it never happened? Closer to home, why did Adam, the robot, hold as Original Equipment the court records of a rape trial in a provincial English town?
I’m afraid that it meant that Mr. McEwan had bitten off more than he could chew, and was frantically avoiding the elephant in the room – a discussion of the moral questions raised in forming a personality from scratch, as Charlie and Miranda, our living protagonists, were faced with doing. Adam was a marvelous machine – he could even enjoy sex – but as delivered he was an ethical blank slate.
So, Mr. McEwan has punted. The book is a mishmash of incident, but we never get down to brass tacks. My five stars have slipped to three.
56 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2019
Verified Purchase
Regardless of the country and time you’re from, you are sure to experience time-space cultural whiplash in McEwan’s latest novel. It’s both dystopian and alt-history. I know that dystopian is supposed to take place in the future, but, instead, McEwan’s convoluted setting this time is in the 1980s London. A very advanced 80s where Alan Turing survived, Tony Benn died (in the Brighton bombing!), JFK survived Dallas and Jimmy Carter beat Regan and was still president. The latter two factoids don’t impact the story but just give a little more alt-history for the context of the author’s setting. And, yes, robots that look like humans and have a bit of dramatic whimsy are the antagonists created by the protagonists.
Charlie is a well-educated but aimless 30-something who earns his money in day trading—usually losing on schemes—has a bit of a shaky past with his law degree but is honestly open and vulnerable in a fetching way, to love. He decides he loves his roomie, a PhD candidate and history major, Miranda, the most enigmatic woman he’d ever met. He was likely attracted to her air of secrets. Charlie takes an inheritance and spends 89 thousand pounds on Adam, a robot who looks good enough to be human, and meant to be programmed by the owner to have whatever characteristics you decide to give him. Thus opens the whole theme of morality and technology and the intersection of the two. And what happens if you let your brand new love interest program half of Adam by herself?
Don’t wait for me to tell you—go read the book! As always, McEwan never disappoints on prose, dry wit, a trough of sentimentality when it comes to romantic love, and the bittersweet shakedowns. It also addresses the limits of consciousness in AI. OK, and that topic has been explored by many other authors in thousands of books, so this wasn’t the reason I read it. I knew that McEwan’s story would be as much philosophy as conflict, and perhaps I’ve heard similar debates and ideas about robots before, but I wanted to observe how McEwan executed his characters and themes as well as story. He’s never a lazy writer, and his ambitions are typically within his sphere of confidence. It wasn’t my favorite McEwan—that spot goes to ATONEMENT. And at times I felt that the author was too restrained, and the liftoff was denied to us as readers.
So, Charlie’s voice sounded a bit dour mixed with hopeful and careless optimism, especially when faced with Adam. Those two definitely had a friction that didn’t work. I think McEwan wanted us to explore how Charlie and Miranda could be a successful couple when they both programmed Adam (but didn’t share the characteristics they programmed into Adam). As the reader, we didn’t know any more than those two—even less, because Miranda’s choices aren’t transparent.
Is Adam actually a combination of the traits they entered, or did he have his own consciousness arising from the two? And, if he didn’t have his own consciousness, what is the difference between having your own consciousness and simulating it? I like how McEwan provokes the reader to speculate, but then again I was a little disappointed in how it remains unanswerable. However, as always with his novels, there’s a bit of a jolt to the denouement—something that pushes you in a lane you weren’t ready for—at least, in one aspect. But there are other parts of the climax that are standard for this kind of novel about robots.
This isn’t a spoiler, but I was especially impressed by Adam’s considered thoughts on vision and death. He compared it to our peripheral vision and awareness. “The odd thing is, there’s no boundary, no edge…There isn’t something, then nothing. What we have is the field of vision, and then beyond it less than nothing.” “So this is what death is like. The edge of vision is a good representation of the edge of consciousness. Life, then death.” There are other nuggets like this that I enjoyed.
My biggest complaint is that Adam didn’t really get under my skin, not as a robot or not as programmed—that, of course, should have been conveyed through the actions, reactions, and interactions between Miranda and Charlie. I thought that McEwan succeeded in somewhat closing the loop and leaving an opening to ponder, but as much as the characters were organically comprised, occasionally it felt stilted. The momentum was halting, and the alt history of the British politics didn’t tie in enough specifically—only in a general way of social sciences. But, I’m glad I read it and I was certainly engaged until the end. What does it mean to be human? What does it mean to be programmed by humans?
Charlie is a well-educated but aimless 30-something who earns his money in day trading—usually losing on schemes—has a bit of a shaky past with his law degree but is honestly open and vulnerable in a fetching way, to love. He decides he loves his roomie, a PhD candidate and history major, Miranda, the most enigmatic woman he’d ever met. He was likely attracted to her air of secrets. Charlie takes an inheritance and spends 89 thousand pounds on Adam, a robot who looks good enough to be human, and meant to be programmed by the owner to have whatever characteristics you decide to give him. Thus opens the whole theme of morality and technology and the intersection of the two. And what happens if you let your brand new love interest program half of Adam by herself?
Don’t wait for me to tell you—go read the book! As always, McEwan never disappoints on prose, dry wit, a trough of sentimentality when it comes to romantic love, and the bittersweet shakedowns. It also addresses the limits of consciousness in AI. OK, and that topic has been explored by many other authors in thousands of books, so this wasn’t the reason I read it. I knew that McEwan’s story would be as much philosophy as conflict, and perhaps I’ve heard similar debates and ideas about robots before, but I wanted to observe how McEwan executed his characters and themes as well as story. He’s never a lazy writer, and his ambitions are typically within his sphere of confidence. It wasn’t my favorite McEwan—that spot goes to ATONEMENT. And at times I felt that the author was too restrained, and the liftoff was denied to us as readers.
So, Charlie’s voice sounded a bit dour mixed with hopeful and careless optimism, especially when faced with Adam. Those two definitely had a friction that didn’t work. I think McEwan wanted us to explore how Charlie and Miranda could be a successful couple when they both programmed Adam (but didn’t share the characteristics they programmed into Adam). As the reader, we didn’t know any more than those two—even less, because Miranda’s choices aren’t transparent.
Is Adam actually a combination of the traits they entered, or did he have his own consciousness arising from the two? And, if he didn’t have his own consciousness, what is the difference between having your own consciousness and simulating it? I like how McEwan provokes the reader to speculate, but then again I was a little disappointed in how it remains unanswerable. However, as always with his novels, there’s a bit of a jolt to the denouement—something that pushes you in a lane you weren’t ready for—at least, in one aspect. But there are other parts of the climax that are standard for this kind of novel about robots.
This isn’t a spoiler, but I was especially impressed by Adam’s considered thoughts on vision and death. He compared it to our peripheral vision and awareness. “The odd thing is, there’s no boundary, no edge…There isn’t something, then nothing. What we have is the field of vision, and then beyond it less than nothing.” “So this is what death is like. The edge of vision is a good representation of the edge of consciousness. Life, then death.” There are other nuggets like this that I enjoyed.
My biggest complaint is that Adam didn’t really get under my skin, not as a robot or not as programmed—that, of course, should have been conveyed through the actions, reactions, and interactions between Miranda and Charlie. I thought that McEwan succeeded in somewhat closing the loop and leaving an opening to ponder, but as much as the characters were organically comprised, occasionally it felt stilted. The momentum was halting, and the alt history of the British politics didn’t tie in enough specifically—only in a general way of social sciences. But, I’m glad I read it and I was certainly engaged until the end. What does it mean to be human? What does it mean to be programmed by humans?
31 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on April 30, 2019
Verified Purchase
Consider the impact of one person on the entire history of the world. Had Alan Turing managed to survive the 1950's blindsided attitude towards his sexuality, would all the technological advancements in the current time have become routine 30 years earlier, in the early 80's? Would electric cars be considered old hat as they'd been around since the '60's? Is it a better world, or is it not? Up for purchase are highly priced android Adams or Eves, and our narrator Charlie has used some found money to purchase one. Benchmark events of the latter half of the 20th century are referred to almost in passing, having been reversed or flipped (Jimmy Carter's second term is happening because the JFK assassination was a "near miss"), and other "what if's" are explored, but these 1980's are not radically different when it comes to the interaction between two lovers. One frustration I had with the book was Charlie's referencing of these events as having occurred many years in the past, teasing me into thinking there'd be some big reveal about how life turned out for him. But it appears to be a memory piece. Not, like Atonement, a reckoning for the future. However, where McEwan shines and does almost better than anyone else is address the life changing moments that aren't recognized at the time.
18 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries

GillyKS
5.0 out of 5 stars
Turing lives
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on July 26, 2019Verified Purchase
Up to date about technology and symbiosis with humans, but rewrite of history ..what might have been

John Plant
5.0 out of 5 stars
Helps us to think about the difference between robots and humans
Reviewed in Canada on June 13, 2021Verified Purchase
This review was written by my wife. I find it deeply perceptive. It's in the form of a dialogue with various statements made throughout this very stimulating novel.
P 139.-140
Mc Ewan questions if biology gives a special status to human, because we are bound by the same physical laws… "The same elements, forces, energy fields, for both are the seeding ground of consciousness in whatever form it takes, and that it means little to say that the robot is not fully alive."
Me: Is this seeding ground of consciousness bound by the same physical laws, the only thing required to be alive and conscious? This is the main unresolved existential question.
P 330:
"He (the robot) was sentient. He had a self. How it's produced, wet neurons, microprocessors, DNA networks, it doesn’t matter. Here was a conscious existence."
Me: A sentient robot would be possible if sentience did not depend of the initial material from which it is produced. Contrary to robots, humans are born already with sentience and emotionally react to their discomfort.
Humans learn through an accumulation of sensitive experiences, while robots learn through billions of alphabetical, numeral and pictural bits of data. Can that lead to the same results? For that it would require a common interface. Electromagnetism? Our state of consciousness is determined by frequencies of EM vibrations moving inside our bodies . We can see, thanks to the frequencies of colors. Each sound of a word or each colour bears its own particular spectral information..
An undiscovered energy? Particles are points of excitations of interconnected quantum fields. But what is the source of this fundamental dynamic aspect of the universe?
P156
"Consciousness can arise from an arrangement of matter."
Me: To exist consciousness requires more than an arrangement of matter. If not, a corpse would be conscious. Without vital energy, no consciousness is possible.
P192
"Life, as language is an open system. It requires external information."
Me: It is true that life and language, being both an open system, requires external information, but there is a significant difference between life and language.
He is right in saying (p193) : "There’s one particular form of intelligence that all the Adam-and-Eve robots know is superior to theirs. This form is highly adaptable and inventive, able to negotiate novel situations and landscapes with perfect ease and theories about them with instinctive brilliance. I am talking about the mind of a child before it’s tasked with facts and practicalities and goals. The Adams and Eves have little grasp of the idea of play- the child’s vital mode of exploration."
P 324
"I think that the A and Es were ill equipped to understand human decision-making, the way our principles are wrapped ii the force field of our emotions. Our peculiar biases, our self-delusion and all the other well-charted peculiar biases, and all the other well-charted defects of our cognition."
Me: Not knowing emotions, robots cannot bring any subtilities and compassion to their knowledge. They work more like the equanimous indifference of the fundamental laws of nature, which does not take into account the sufferings and deaths of its individual living entities.
But, as Stephen Hawkings so memorably asked: "What brings fire into the equation and makes a universe for them to describe?"
P 139.-140
Mc Ewan questions if biology gives a special status to human, because we are bound by the same physical laws… "The same elements, forces, energy fields, for both are the seeding ground of consciousness in whatever form it takes, and that it means little to say that the robot is not fully alive."
Me: Is this seeding ground of consciousness bound by the same physical laws, the only thing required to be alive and conscious? This is the main unresolved existential question.
P 330:
"He (the robot) was sentient. He had a self. How it's produced, wet neurons, microprocessors, DNA networks, it doesn’t matter. Here was a conscious existence."
Me: A sentient robot would be possible if sentience did not depend of the initial material from which it is produced. Contrary to robots, humans are born already with sentience and emotionally react to their discomfort.
Humans learn through an accumulation of sensitive experiences, while robots learn through billions of alphabetical, numeral and pictural bits of data. Can that lead to the same results? For that it would require a common interface. Electromagnetism? Our state of consciousness is determined by frequencies of EM vibrations moving inside our bodies . We can see, thanks to the frequencies of colors. Each sound of a word or each colour bears its own particular spectral information..
An undiscovered energy? Particles are points of excitations of interconnected quantum fields. But what is the source of this fundamental dynamic aspect of the universe?
P156
"Consciousness can arise from an arrangement of matter."
Me: To exist consciousness requires more than an arrangement of matter. If not, a corpse would be conscious. Without vital energy, no consciousness is possible.
P192
"Life, as language is an open system. It requires external information."
Me: It is true that life and language, being both an open system, requires external information, but there is a significant difference between life and language.
He is right in saying (p193) : "There’s one particular form of intelligence that all the Adam-and-Eve robots know is superior to theirs. This form is highly adaptable and inventive, able to negotiate novel situations and landscapes with perfect ease and theories about them with instinctive brilliance. I am talking about the mind of a child before it’s tasked with facts and practicalities and goals. The Adams and Eves have little grasp of the idea of play- the child’s vital mode of exploration."
P 324
"I think that the A and Es were ill equipped to understand human decision-making, the way our principles are wrapped ii the force field of our emotions. Our peculiar biases, our self-delusion and all the other well-charted peculiar biases, and all the other well-charted defects of our cognition."
Me: Not knowing emotions, robots cannot bring any subtilities and compassion to their knowledge. They work more like the equanimous indifference of the fundamental laws of nature, which does not take into account the sufferings and deaths of its individual living entities.
But, as Stephen Hawkings so memorably asked: "What brings fire into the equation and makes a universe for them to describe?"

lucien c
4.0 out of 5 stars
Interessante, mas não mais do que isso
Reviewed in Brazil on June 14, 2019Verified Purchase
Em se tratando de um romance de Ian McEwan sempre se espera algo de muito especial; mas este livro deixa um pouco a desejar, é um tanto mecânico e previsível.

jean luc moncel
2.0 out of 5 stars
Boring...
Reviewed in France on April 23, 2020Verified Purchase
I bought that book after a review of the french edition in a famous radio show, where it had been warmly reviewed.
The book is a mix of sci-fi and romantic, which describes the evolution of a love triangle in which one is a robot.
Unforunately the writer is not good at either style. Anyone who knows a little about sci-fi sees immediately that he is not familiar with it, his dramatic mecanisms are terribly worn. His resources in the romantic genre are also very limited, with the usual mix of jealousy, anxiety and sideration.
This is a demonstration that any writer cannot become a genre writer.
The style is bland, completely lacking humour.
The book is supposed to question the essence of existence; when the book is finished, the reader is none the wiser.
This is one of these books that make me feel like I've wasted a few hours.
The book is a mix of sci-fi and romantic, which describes the evolution of a love triangle in which one is a robot.
Unforunately the writer is not good at either style. Anyone who knows a little about sci-fi sees immediately that he is not familiar with it, his dramatic mecanisms are terribly worn. His resources in the romantic genre are also very limited, with the usual mix of jealousy, anxiety and sideration.
This is a demonstration that any writer cannot become a genre writer.
The style is bland, completely lacking humour.
The book is supposed to question the essence of existence; when the book is finished, the reader is none the wiser.
This is one of these books that make me feel like I've wasted a few hours.

Susan Watterson
5.0 out of 5 stars
Another McEwan success
Reviewed in Canada on August 22, 2019Verified Purchase
This fiction seemed to me so relevant to our age and predicaments!
Customers who read this book also read
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Get everything you need
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1