A self-assured businessman murders his employer, the husband of his mistress, which unintentionally provokes an ill-fated chain of events.A self-assured businessman murders his employer, the husband of his mistress, which unintentionally provokes an ill-fated chain of events.A self-assured businessman murders his employer, the husband of his mistress, which unintentionally provokes an ill-fated chain of events.
Videos1
See production, box office, & company info
Florence Carala and her lover, Julien Tavernier, want to murder her husband - Julien's boss - by faking his suicide. But after Julien's killed him, and had left, he remembers he's forgotten the rope outside the window which could implicate him, and he returns to the building to remove it —Stephan Eichenberg <eichenbe@fak-cbg.tu-muenchen.de>
Top review
My Friend before Dinner
I never physically met the man, but I consider Malle an old friend.
He made two films that I think are among the most perfect and intellectually adventurous I know. He also made some good films that aren't life-changing but that show insight. This is one of them.
There are no new ideas here. It unfolds as one expects. The drama is muted to the point of homeopathy.
And yet we like it because it is so economical. Its bare, honest, true. So we like it, just like we gravitate to an open person regardless of whether she is dumb. I appreciate Bresson for this, his economy which blesses the viewer with a mind that necessarily filters what we see. But Bresson goes too far and presses into the impress of abstraction. Malle is real because it is overtly untheatrical.
Its worth seeing because it is seamless bamboo and because it informs "Vanya" and "Dinner." But in terms of its effect; its callow post-noir noir. And it has that hint at the end of a "film" within that condemns the couple.
Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.
He made two films that I think are among the most perfect and intellectually adventurous I know. He also made some good films that aren't life-changing but that show insight. This is one of them.
There are no new ideas here. It unfolds as one expects. The drama is muted to the point of homeopathy.
And yet we like it because it is so economical. Its bare, honest, true. So we like it, just like we gravitate to an open person regardless of whether she is dumb. I appreciate Bresson for this, his economy which blesses the viewer with a mind that necessarily filters what we see. But Bresson goes too far and presses into the impress of abstraction. Malle is real because it is overtly untheatrical.
Its worth seeing because it is seamless bamboo and because it informs "Vanya" and "Dinner." But in terms of its effect; its callow post-noir noir. And it has that hint at the end of a "film" within that condemns the couple.
Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.
helpful•129
- tedg
- Jun 18, 2007
![Thomas Mars from ‘Phoenix’ (‘On the Rocks’ composer): ‘Most musicians know how to whistle’ [Exclusive Video Interview]](https://iza-server.uibk.ac.at/pywb/dilimag/20210113092156im_/https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BOWNhZThkZWEtMjYyYS00MWNkLWE1MmQtNTM0MzYwMzA2Y2Q3XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTE0MzQwMjgz._V1_QL75_UY133_CR22,0,90,133_.jpg)
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
Is Ascenseur pour l'échafaud (1958) known by a different name in Canada in English? If yes, what is it known as?
Answer
Recently viewed
You have no recently viewed pages